SUMMARY of the Article “Matters of Legitimacy” Dawn, September 9th, 2024)
The article by Shahid Kardar and Shafqat Mahmood addresses the deep-seated governance crisis in Pakistan, highlighting the increasing gap between state capabilities and public expectations. With the country’s population growing rapidly and opportunities for decent living not matching this growth, the state’s inability to maintain order and enforce laws is becoming more evident. The insurgency in Balochistan and rising security threats in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Sindh, and Punjab underscore the weakening control of the state. Additionally, the judicial system’s failure to provide justice has eroded trust in the rule of law, a key pillar of functional governance. The writers argue that the political and civilian institutions, which should have been reformed, are instead crippled by bureaucracy and lack of moral legitimacy. The establishment’s control over state institutions and manipulation of the Constitution has left the current governance structure without public trust. The writers stress that legitimacy, stemming from adherence to the rule of law and the Constitution, is vital for governance. The current environment of political exclusion, such as the actions against the PTI and Imran Khan, has further alienated the populace. The writers call for a reset of the state, advocating for collaboration among all stakeholders, and urging that legitimacy be restored through free, fair, and transparent elections.
Easy/Short SUMMARY:
The article discusses the serious challenges faced by Pakistan, including population growth, insurgency, and governance failure. The authors argue that the state’s institutions are weak, contributing to insecurity in areas like Balochistan and Sindh. Pakistan’s political institutions lack legitimacy because the establishment controls them and manipulates the Constitution. This is causing people to lose trust in the government, especially with actions against political figures like Imran Khan. The authors believe that only through free and fair elections, with the public’s participation, can legitimacy and stability be restored.
SOLUTIONS of The Problem:
Restoring Rule of Law
The government must rigorously implement the Constitution and ensure that the law applies equally to all citizens, reinforcing the state’s legitimacy.
Free and Fair Elections
Conduct transparent elections that allow the people to choose their representatives freely, rebuilding trust in the democratic process.
Judicial Reforms
The judicial system should be reformed to ensure that it can efficiently enforce contracts, resolve disputes, and hold criminals accountable, strengthening the rule of law.
Strengthen Civilian Institutions
Rebuild civilian institutions to effectively manage the country’s governance, security, and service delivery systems, reducing reliance on the military establishment.
Address Political Alienation
Engage with disenfranchised political groups and address their concerns to prevent further political and social unrest.
Promote Inclusivity in Governance
Create a more inclusive political system where all stakeholders have a say in governance decisions, fostering a sense of national unity.
End Bureaucratic Resistance to Reforms
Combat the entrenched bureaucracy that often blocks necessary reforms by encouraging accountability and transparency within the civil service.
Improve Public Services
Focus on improving public services, such as education, healthcare, and law enforcement, to enhance the legitimacy of the state.
Foster Economic Growth
Create job opportunities and improve living standards by investing in sectors that can boost economic growth and reduce the sense of alienation among the populace.
Collaboration over Confrontation
All political and institutional stakeholders should collaborate instead of confront each other, promoting a more cooperative environment to move the country forward.
IMPORTANT Facts and Figures Given in the article:
- Pakistan’s population is growing rapidly, outpacing opportunities for decent living.
- Insurgency in Balochistan and increased attacks in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Sindh, and Punjab are weakening the state’s control.
- The judicial system has lost its ability to enforce contracts or hold criminals accountable, undermining the rule of law.
- The political institutions lack legitimacy due to the establishment’s control and manipulation of the Constitution.
- The article calls for free, impartial, and transparent elections to restore legitimacy.
MCQs from the Article:
1. What is causing a gap between state capacity and people’s expectations in Pakistan?
A. Increased education
B. Rapid population growth
C. Improved infrastructure
D. Economic surplus
2. Which province is facing a serious insurgency according to the article?
A. Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
B. Balochistan
C. Sindh
D. Punjab
3. What is undermining the rule of law in Pakistan, as mentioned in the article?
A. Economic recession
B. Judicial system’s inability to enforce contracts and hold criminals accountable
C. Military interventions
D. International sanctions
4. What is lacking in Pakistan’s political institutions, as per the article?
A. Popularity
B. Military support
C. Moral legitimacy and public ownership
D. Economic power
5. What solution do the authors suggest for addressing Pakistan’s governance issues?
A. Military rule
B. Economic reforms only
C. Increased bureaucracy
D. Free, impartial, and transparent elections
VOCABULARY:
- Exponential (adjective) (ترقی پذیر): Rapidly increasing in amount or extent.
- Diminishing (adjective) (کم ہوتا ہوا): Becoming smaller or less.
- Insurgency (noun) (بغاوت): An active revolt or uprising.
- Alienation (noun) (الگ تھلگ کرنا): Feeling of isolation or estrangement.
- Outlaws (noun) (مجرم): People who have committed a crime or violated laws.
- Legitimacy (noun) (جواز): Conformity to the law or to rules.
- Resentment (noun) (ناراضگی): Bitter indignation at having been treated unfairly.
- Arbitrate (verb) (ثالثی کرنا): To settle a dispute or disagreement.
- Anaemic (adjective) (کمزور): Lacking in vitality, strength, or effectiveness.
- Foisted (verb) (زبردستی نافذ کرنا): Imposed an unnecessary or unwelcome thing.
- ECP (noun) (الیکشن کمیشن): Election Commission of Pakistan, responsible for overseeing elections.
- Disenfranchised (adjective) (حق رائے دہی سے محروم): Deprived of the right to vote or other rights.
- Existential (adjective) (وجودی): Relating to existence, especially in terms of a threat to survival.
- Veneer (noun) (پرت): A thin decorative layer, often used metaphorically for superficial appearances.
- Constitutionality (noun) (آئین کی مطابقت): Compliance with the constitution or legal framework of a state.
- Collaboration (noun) (تعاون): Working together towards a common goal.
- Confrontation (noun) (مقابلہ): A situation of conflict or opposition.
- Reset (noun) (دوبارہ ترتیب دینا): Starting anew with different goals or strategies.
- Ingrained (adjective) (جڑ پکڑنا): Deeply rooted or established.
- Thwart (verb) (روکنا): To prevent someone from accomplishing something.
📢 Attention Please!
We appreciate your commitment to acquiring knowledge through our summaries. Please be reminded not to remove the attribution label affixed to this article. It is crucial to acknowledge the source and the effort invested in creating this summary. We discourage any unauthorized distribution without proper credit. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation. 🔍
⚡ Explore More Summaries, Solutions, and Vocabulary Meanings!
💡 Join our WhatsApp Channel for timely and comprehensive summaries of the latest articles, along with well-crafted solutions and helpful vocabulary meanings. Click the link below to join now:
🔗 Dawn Article Summaries
WhatsApp Channel Link
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va7tT3o35fLnJeFbpS2y
dawn.com
Matters of legitimacy
Shahid Kardar, Shafqat Mahmood
IN an earlier article contributed by one of us in these columns it was argued that Pakistan is passing through a difficult phase, confronted by multiple challenges. And instead of being contained these are on the rise.
On the one hand, the population is growing exponentially with opportunities for a decent living not keeping pace with the rising numbers. And on the other, the gap between diminishing state capacity and people’s expectations is making this task formidable. The civilian institutions on which the structure of the state rests, are largely dysfunctional, contributing to general pessimism and demoralisation.
Maintaining order is a basic duty of the state but recent events are showing ominous weakness of this capacity. An insurgency is seriously threatening Balochistan, reflecting a failure of sermons on patriotism to create a sense of togetherness. This sense of alienation is fueled by a perception among the people of political marginalisation and lack of any effective control over their resources.
Elsewhere, sporadic, but lethal, attacks continue in the old tribal areas of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and are now spreading to D.I. Khan, Mardan and Swat. The situation in the riverine areas of upper Sindh and south Punjab is also alarming. Outlaws seemingly reign supreme with their area of operation expanding.
The lack of legitimacy is engendering resentment and alienation, making governance difficult.
The ability of the state to provide justice has also declined. This is reflected in the judicial system’s diminished ability to enforce a contract, arbitrate a dispute or hold criminals to account. This has seriously undermined the rule of law, another pre-requisite of a functioning state.
To summarise, the overall structure of governance barely seems to be working and is not responsive to today’s challenges. While attempts at reform have been few and far between, even these have successfully been foiled by the bureaucracy.
The battle for rulership of the state presents an equally disconcerting picture. Irrespective of the text of the Constitution, the unfettered establishment effectively rules, through its active involvement in the functioning of all state institutions.
To provide itself a thin veneer of civilian respectability, a civilian set-up with anaemic roots among the people has been foisted on an unwilling nation. And to preserve this status quo and to thwart all challenges to it, the ECP has been commandeered, the Constitution defied, judiciary threatened, and parliament emasculated.
The result is that ‘presiding’ representative and supporting institutions lack moral legitimacy and general public ownership. The actions against the PTI and its leader Imran Khan have further estranged millions, who having lost trust in the integrity of the electoral system, and are discontented on being disenfranchised. With severe alienation already visible in Balochistan, this denial of a people’s mandate adds to the overall disaffection among the people with the state.
In our view, headway on issues of economy, security, justice and service delivery can only proceed if the basic organisational arrangement of the state has not just legal but also moral legitimacy. Today, the representative and supporting institutions lack this and therefore have no public ownership.
The lack of legitimacy is engendering resentment and alienation, making governance difficult. Several elements of administration require active participation of the people, without which any task, be it development or security, becomes much tougher.
This is particularly crucial in fighting an insurgency because it cannot survive without popular support. This is also true of terrorism in general. An existential challenge to the state is thus directly linked to legitimacy and people’s participation.
Legitimacy by most definitions would mean rule of law. And the fundamental law of any state is its Constitution. The legitimacy of the systems will come only from its rigorous implementation. While this may be a necessary condition, it is not a sufficient one. The Constitution can still be manipulated to merely observe its form, and sometimes not even that, to deny popular will and infringe on fundamental rights.
The February election is an example of form over content and substance. While every part of it was manipulated, an appearance of democracy was maintained through minimum constitutionality. How can state institutions demand others to remain within the ambit of the Constitution while themselves flouting it?
An attempt is now afoot in parliament to introduce amendments to the Constitution with the purpose of undermining judicial decisions and packing the court with handpicked judges. The Supreme Court can strike these down being violative of the basic structure of the Constitution, but this would mean a standoff between different organs of the state. This too is not desirable.
When we are suggesting a reset of the state it cannot be done through hostility and stand-offs. A realisation has to dawn on all stakeholders, and particularly the establishment, that the path we are on cannot be sustained. The way forward has to be collaboration not confrontation. All stakeholders need to sit together and chart a new course. Only then will there be a chance of moving forward.
A lot needs to be done but to begin with we have to ensure legitimacy. It means a recognition of people’s right to choose their representatives, and thereby who should govern them, through a free, impartial and transparent election. This has to be accompanied by the acceptance of results and a peaceful transfer of power.
Every state on the rise has been able to cross these two hurdles. We have almost never done so. This mindset has to change. Only then it would be possible to commence the long process of renewal.
Admittedly, sustained support for civilian institutions will only become ingrained from improved performance. To date the record of matters essentially in the civilian domain hasn’t been inspiring. Examples include the poorly negotiated IPPs, the quality of education delivery and the massive losses of state-owned enterprises. But, to begin with, the fundamental question of legitimacy has to be resolved before moving forward.
Shafqat Mahmood is a former federal minister.
Shahid Kardar is a former governor of the State Bank of Pakistan.
Published in Dawn, September 9th, 2024