SUMMARY of the Article “Pakistan regionally” by Dr. Niaz Murtaza, Dawn [Published on December 12th, 2023]


Dr. Niaz Murtaza analyzes Pakistan’s economic status in South Asia, particularly comparing it with India and Bangladesh using World Bank data up to 2022. Pakistan lags significantly in various economic indicators, such as GDP per capita, GDP growth, inflation, investment-GDP ratio, external balance, public finance, debt, and social development. Despite brief growth spurts in the past, these were often fueled by high fiscal and external deficits, leading to economic crises. Pakistan faces challenges in exports, foreign investment, and reserves flows, resulting in frequent economic crises compared to Bangladesh and India. The country’s debt-GDP ratio is high, and the 10-year debt service-exports ratio raises concerns. Education and health outlay ratios are low, while the defense outlay ratio remains high. Dr. Murtaza argues that a fair and productive economy seems distant, and the forces needed to bring about positive change are currently weak.

Easy/Short SUMMARY:

Dr. Niaz Murtaza’s analysis reveals that Pakistan faces significant economic challenges compared to its South Asian neighbors, particularly India and Bangladesh. Lagging behind in GDP, investment, external balance, and social indicators, the country has experienced frequent economic crises. Despite past growth spurts, these were often unsustainable. The article suggests that the transition to a fair and productive economy is hindered by weak forces for positive change.

SOLUTIONS of The Problem:

1. Enhance Investment-GDP Ratio:

  • Implement policies to increase the investment-GDP ratio, ensuring sustainable and long-term economic growth.

2. Diversify Exports:

  • Develop strategies to diversify exports, aiming to improve the export-GDP ratio and reduce the reliance on a few sectors.

3. Strengthen External Balance:

  • Focus on improving foreign reserves-external debt ratios and reducing current account deficits to enhance external balance.

4. Fiscal Responsibility:

  • Work towards reducing debt-GDP ratios through responsible fiscal policies and efficient debt management.

5. Prioritize Education and Health Outlays:

  • Allocate more resources to education and health sectors to improve human development indicators and create a skilled workforce.

6. Promote Merit-Led Economy:

  • Transition from a patronage-led economy to a merit-led one, emphasizing competence and efficiency in economic policies.

7. Reduce Dependency on Transient Stimuli:

  • Develop strategies to reduce dependency on non-durable local or external stimuli for economic growth, aiming for sustainability.

8. Stabilize Political and Economic Landscape:

  • Work towards stabilizing the political and economic landscape to attract foreign investment and foster economic growth.

9. Foster International Collaboration:

  • Collaborate with international partners to address economic challenges, seek advice, and foster economic cooperation.

10. Empower Middle-Class Leadership:

  • Encourage and empower middle-class leaders who can bring about positive change and focus on the welfare of the broader population.

IMPORTANT Facts and Figures Given in the Article:

  • GDP per Capita (2022):
  • South Asia (mean): $2,200
  • Bangladesh: $2,700
  • India: $2,300
  • Pakistan: $1,600

  • Investment-GDP Ratio:

  • South Asia (mean): 30%
  • Pakistan: 15%

  • Export-GDP Ratio (10-year mean):

  • South Asia: 19%
  • Bangladesh: 14%
  • India: 21%
  • Pakistan: 10%

  • Foreign Reserves-External Debt Ratio:

  • South Asia: 69%
  • Bangladesh: 60%
  • India: 82%
  • Pakistan: 20%

  • Debt-GDP Ratio (2021):

  • India: 40%
  • Pakistan: 70%
  • South Asia (mean): 80%

  • 10-year Debt Service-Exports Ratio:

  • Pakistan: 23%
  • South Asia (mean): 12%

  • Tax-to-GDP Ratio (India, Pakistan, Bangladesh):

  • India: 20%
  • Pakistan: 13%
  • Bangladesh: 8%

Key Facts and Figures Table

Indicator South Asia (Mean) Bangladesh India Pakistan
GDP per Capita (2022) $2,200 $2,700 $2,300 $1,600
Investment-GDP Ratio (10-year Mean) 30% 15%
Export-GDP Ratio (10-year Mean) 19% 14% 21% 10%
Foreign Reserves-External Debt Ratio 69% 60% 82% 20%
Debt-GDP Ratio (2021) 40% 70%
10-year Debt Service-Exports Ratio 12% 23%
Tax-to-GDP Ratio 8% 20% 13%

Source: https://www.dawn.com/news/1797191/pakistan-regionally

MCQs from the Article:

  1. What is the GDP per capita of Pakistan in 2022?
    A. $2,200
    B. $2,700
    C. $1,600
    D. $2,300
    Answer: C

  2. Which country in South Asia has the highest investment-GDP ratio?
    A. Pakistan
    B. Bangladesh
    C. India
    D. Not mentioned in the article
    Answer: C

  3. What is the 10-year mean export-GDP ratio of India?
    A. 19%
    B. 21%
    C. 14%
    D. 10%
    Answer: B

  4. Which ratio reflects the debt-GDP status in 2021?
    A. 70% for Pakistan
    B. 40% for India
    C. 80% for South Asia
    D. All of the above
    Answer: D

  5. What is the tax-to-GDP ratio of Pakistan?
    A. 20%
    B. 8%
    C. 13%
    D. Not mentioned in the article
    Answer: C

VOCABULARY:

  1. Elitist (adjective) (متعلق بالیت): Relating to or supporting the view that a society or system should be led by an elite.
  2. Neoliberal (adjective) (نئولیبرل): Relating to a modified form of liberalism tending to favor free-market capitalism.
  3. Rapacious (adjective) (لالچی): Aggressively greedy or grasping.
  4. Autocratic (adjective) (خود مختار): Relating to or typical of absolute rule; authoritarian.
  5. Patronage (noun) (سرپرستی): The support, encouragement, privilege, or financial aid that an organization or individual bestows to another.
  6. Stimuli (noun) (محرکات): A thing or event that evokes a specific functional reaction in an organ or tissue.
  7. Sustainability (noun) (ہمیشگی): The ability to be maintained at a certain rate or level.
  8. Inflation (noun) (مہلکت): A general increase in prices and fall in the purchasing value of money.
  9. Legacies (noun) (میراث): A thing handed down by a predecessor.
  10. Stagflation (noun) (ستہ‌فلےشن): Persistent high inflation combined with high unemployment and

stagnant demand in a country’s economy.

📢 Attention Readers!
We are deeply concerned about individuals who share our summaries without providing proper credit. We kindly request that you refrain from removing the attribution label affixed to this article. Considerable time, effort, resources, and expertise have been invested in its creation. It is essential to exhibit professionalism by crediting the source appropriately and acknowledging the rightful contributions. Your cooperation in sharing the original article is greatly appreciated. Failure to comply with this request may lead to legal consequences. We maintain a dedicated team of advocates ready to address instances of unprofessional and unethical behaviour, including copyright infringement.
🔥 Get Concise Editorial Summaries, Solutions, and Vocabulary Meanings! 🔥
🔵 Prepared by the Expert Team at CSSMCQs.com! 🔵
👉 Looking for a hassle-free way to stay informed about current affairs and editorial insights? We’ve got you covered! 💡
✨ Introducing “Dawn Important Editorials“! ✨
📚 Join our WhatsApp Channel for quick and comprehensive summaries of the latest editorials, along with well-crafted solutions and helpful vocabulary meanings. 📚
🔍 Why Choose Us? 🔍
👉 Our team at CSSMCQs.com uses their efforts to bring you accurate and efficient summaries.
👉 Stay updated with the most important points from the editorials, saving you time and effort.
👉 Benefit from our expertly crafted solutions that offer insightful perspectives and creative ideas.
👉 Expand your vocabulary with our thorough explanations and translations.
👉 All this is at your fingertips, available in one convenient WhatsApp group!
🌟 Why Reading Summaries are so necessary for CSS & PMS Aspirants?
📝 Cultivating Critical Analysis: Summaries of editorials and opinions distill the essence of complex arguments, enhancing your ability to dissect intricate ideas, extract core arguments, and recognize underlying themes.
📝 Efficient Time Management: CSS aspirants often juggle multiple subjects and topics. Reading summarized editorials and opinions allows you to grasp diverse viewpoints in a fraction of the time.
📝 Diverse Perspectives: CSS exams require a comprehensive understanding of various perspectives. Summaries expose you to a range of viewpoints on critical issues, helping you broaden your intellectual horizons.
📝 Quick Updates on Current Affairs: Summarized editorials provide quick updates on the latest happenings, enabling you to stay informed about recent developments without delving into lengthy articles.
📝 Constructing Coherent Arguments: The concise nature of summaries teaches you how to articulate complex ideas succinctly. This skill is invaluable when constructing well-structured and concise answers in the CSS exam.
📝 Enhancing Writing Skills: Analyzing succinct summaries equips you with the ability to distill your thoughts into concise, coherent sentences – a skill that directly translates into writing impactful essays and answers.
📝 Practical Application in Interviews: Summarized opinions give you a bank of well-articulated arguments that you can draw upon during interviews. This helps you participate actively in discussions, demonstrating your depth of knowledge.
📝 Retaining Key Concepts: Summarizing editorials involves identifying the core concepts. This process reinforces your memory and understanding of crucial topics, ensuring they stay embedded in your long-term memory.
📝 Stimulating Critical Thinking: When you engage with summarized editorials, you’re encouraged to think critically about the main points and arguments. This practice nurtures your ability to question assumptions and delve deeper into subjects.
📝 Adaptable Learning: Summaries allow you to adapt your learning approach based on your time and goals. Whether you’re seeking a quick update or an in-depth analysis, summaries can cater to your needs.

To receive the summaries, solutions, and vocabulary meanings directly on WhatsApp, click the link below and join “Dawn Important Editorials” now:
🔗 https://cssmcqs.com/dawn-editorials-articles-summary-for-students-pdf-download/
📝 Register on our website [https://cssmcqs.com/register/] for more exclusive benefits and resources.
📢 Stay informed, be prepared, and excel in your knowledge-building journey with CSSMCQs.com! 📢
🔔 Join our WhatsApp group and seize the opportunity for valuable insights! 🔔
Looking forward to having you as part of our vibrant community!
Best regards,
CSS MCQs


dawn.com

Pakistan regionally

BY Dr Niaz Murtaza

WE lag economically even in South Asia. This lag is well-known but not its huge scale. To display that, I compare Saarc economies using World Bank data which runs up to 2022 and thus excludes our poor 2023 data. I focus on the state we left (India) and the one that left us (Bangladesh) to show our lag even against ones with similar DNAs.

GDP: South Asia (mean), Bangladesh and India’s GDP per capita in 2022 were about $2,200, $2,700 and $2,300, but ours was only $1,600. Their 10-year mean GDP growths were about six per cent but ours only 4.4pc and inflation was 5.3pc, 6.2pc and 5.6pc. Ours was 8pc (and 30pc inflation in 2023). The investment-GDP ratio of the other three is 30pc but ours only 15pc. Only high investment and productivity ensure long-term high GDP growth. Our low ratio shows that our brief growth spurts under Musharraf, the PML-N and PTI came from high fiscal and external deficits and money supply growth and caused economic crises in 2008, 2018 and 2023.

External balance: We do worse here. Since 2000, we have had seven economic crises that led us to IMF against three for Bangladesh and none for India. This mainly reflects our poor exports, foreign investment and reserves flows. South Asia, Bangladesh and India’s 10-year mean export-GDP ratios were about 19pc, 14pc and 21pc; ours only 10pc. Foreign reserves-external debt ratios were 69pc, 60pc and 82pc but ours only 20pc. Our current account deficit and foreign investment-GDP ratios are also the worst.

Public finance and debt: The regional data here is patchy. India’s recent tax-to-GDP ratio is about 20pc, ours 13pc and Bangladesh’s 8pc. Yet its debt-GDP ratio was about 40pc in 2021 against 70pc for us, 80pc for India and 86pc for South Asia. But our 10-year debt service-exports ratio is 23pc vs only 12pc, 8pc and 11pc for South Asia, Bangladesh and India. Our education and health outlay ratios were the lowest but the defence outlay ratio the highest over 10 years.

A fair and productive economy remains a distant prospect.

Thus, on almost all key social and economic axes, we lag regionally. Even tiny Maldives ($11,000), Sri Lanka and Bhutan (both $3,000-plus) beat us on per capita GDP and Nepal on the human development index, leaving us ahead of only the Afghans. Why has the proud ‘ideological’ fortress created with so much hype and hope done so much worse than less pretentious states?

We think we were on the way to being an economic star under dictators but got waylaid under civilians. This is humbug. All our regimes used non-durable local or foreign stimuli to achieve transient growth that bust soon. People argue that mean GDP growth under Ayub was 5.8pc but 4.8pc under Bhutto. Even this is not a big fall. But take Ayub’s first five years only to fairly match Bhutto’s term, and his falls to 4.9pc. Ayub gained from a booming global economy (capitalism’s golden age), huge US aid and unfair milking of the Bengalis. Bhutto had oil shocks, global stagflation and big floods but not aid.

Yet Bhutto did better than Ayub on most key axes: poverty rose under Ayub but fell under Bhutto; our export-GDP ratio was only about 7pc under Ayub but 12pc under Bhutto (it being highest in the civilian 1990s at 16pc); the trade-deficit-GDP ratio was about -7pc under Ayub but only -4pc under Bhutto and investment growth only 12pc under Ayub but highest ever at 35pc under Bhutto. His public investment fuelled high growth even under Zia initially before US aid became a transient stimulus. But there were big issues with Bhutto’s autocratic era too. For example, nationalisation was overdone and state units badly run by a harassed and deskilled bureaucracy.

Later regimes, too, all used non-durable local and/or external stimuli to provide transient growth. But civilians faced the worst external shocks (2008 and Covid-19 global crises) and legacies from eras where the establishment dominated. The result is an unproductive, elitist and patronage-led economy run on transient stimuli and thus crisis-prone. How can change come?

In India and Bangladesh, civilians run the economy and politics. So, the establishment’s hold in both realms must end. Civilians must then turn a patronage-led economy into a merit-led one. But our civilian leaders are more elitist than middle-class ones in the other two states. Even our main middle-class ones offer empty populism. The best they may do if facing collapse is to turn a rapacious economy run by the Ishaq Dars and Shaukat Tarins into only a slightly better neoliberal one run by the Miftah Ismails and Shamshad Akhtars that is less crisis-prone yet more anti-poor and thus more conflict-prone. So, a fair and productive economy remains a distant prospect. The forces that can create it are still too weak.

The writer is a political economist with a PhD degree from the University of California, Berkeley.

[email protected]

X: @NiazMurtaza2

Published in Dawn, December 12th, 2023

If the aforementioned Answer is Wrong. Leave a Reply with an authentic source.